Monday, April 17, 2017

Wells' Social Commentary and Depiction of Social Darwinism

Initially, the Time Traveller believes that the Eloi, being the only "humans" he encountered, to be the result of society's desire for greater security in all aspects of life. He applies the theory of evolution to reach this conclusion. What factors would need to be in place in order for humanity to reach the state he found it in? What benefit could the adaptations of the Eloi serve?

“For the first time I began to realize an odd  consequence  of  the  social  effort  in  which  we  are  at  present  engaged.  And  yet,  come  to  think,  it  is  a  logical  consequence  enough.  Strength  is  the  outcome  of  need;  security  sets  a  premium  on  feebleness.  The  work  of  ameliorating  the  conditions  of  life—the  true  civilizing  process  that  makes  life  more  and  more  secure—had  gone  steadily on to a climax. One triumph of a united humanity over  Nature  had  followed  another.” (37)

“I thought of the physical slightness of the people, their lack  of  intelligence,  and  those  big  abundant  ruins,  and  it  strengthened  my  belief  in  a  perfect  conquest  of  Nature.  For  after  the  battle  comes  Quiet.  Humanity  had  been  strong,  energetic,  and  intelligent,  and  had  used  all  its  abundant  vitality  to  alter  the  conditions  under  which  it  lived.   And   now   came   the   reaction   of   the   altered   conditions. ‘Under  the  new  conditions  of  perfect  comfort  and  security,  that  restless  energy,  that  with  us  is  strength,  would  become  weakness.  Even  in  our  own  time  certain  tendencies  and  desires,  once  necessary  to  survival,  are  a  constant source of failure.” (39)

In the Time Traveller's observation, I believe that Wells is criticizing the desire of 19th century society to move towards comfort and away from the conflicts and strife that are part of survival. At some point, Wells posits, the security and leisure with which we seek to live can be a detriment, especially if we did not achieve it independently. Additionally, Wells establishes that the Time Traveller is a competent and well versed scientist -- he is knowledgeable of current scientific discourse and theory -- this would make readers more trusting of his observations.


Upon discovering that humanity had not involved with complete uniformity, but rather two distinct species: the Uppergrounders and Below Grounders, the Eloi and the Morlocks, the Time Traveller begins speculating on the cause of this divergence. Being the intellectual that he is, the Time Traveller uses the lens of Social Darwinism to refine his theory. It is in this refined theory, that the true social commentary lies.

“The Upper-world people might once have been  the  favoured  aristocracy,  and  the  Morlocks  their  mechanical  servants:  but  that  had  long  since  passed  away.” (71)
   
The Time Traveller postulates:

“And  then  I  thought  once  more  of  the meat that I had seen. I felt assured now of what it was, and  from  the  bottom  of  my  heart  I  pitied  this  last  feeble  rill  from  the  great  flood  of  humanity.  Clearly,  at  some  time in the Long-Ago of human decay the Morlocks’ food had run short. Possibly they had lived on rats and such-like vermin.” (77)
  
The Time Traveller concludes that at some point, the Morlocks and the Eloi lived separate from eachother peacefully, but at some point in time, the peace was jeopardized, and as a result, the once powerful Eloi, now consigned to indolence, were being preyed upon by the once oppressed Morlocks.

“Then  I  tried  to  preserve  myself  from  the  horror  that  was  coming  upon  me,  by  regarding  it  as  a  rigorous  punishment  of  human  selfishness.  Man  had  been  content  to live in ease and delight upon the labours of his fellow-man,  had  taken  Necessity  as  his  watchword  and  excuse,  and  in  the  fullness  of  time  Necessity  had  come  home  to  him.” (78)

If the Eloi are the aristocracy, and the Morlocks are the working class, Wells commentary is evident. Separation of the working class from the aristocracy in such a strict and rigid fashion will ultimately culminate in violence when one of the groups inevitably seeks to reject the societal bounds. The Social commentary is made even more coherent when considering the Time Traveller's own thoughts of the separation of class in England: 
"Even  now,  does  not  an  East-end  worker  live  in  such  artificial  conditions  as  practically  to  be  cut  off  from  the natural surface of the earth? (60)"

While the theories of Social Darwinism help to create a science fiction text that is somewhat accurate in speculation, they are far more impactful to the readers as they apply to the current societal conditions. The separation of the aristocracy and the working class, made larger and larger by gaps in education and affluence are explicitly warned against by Wells. The ideas of social structure and their implications for the future generations of society that Wells deals with are profound, and carry relevance even in today's society. 




No comments:

Post a Comment